1. The Defendant’s KRW 105,83,841, KRW 103,583,841, KRW 154,875,762, and each of the said money to Plaintiff A.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D around 04:30 on April 20, 2016, 2016, D is the Esch Rexton car (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(B) Around the 32-lane of the Kancho Police Station located on the port from the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle to the left side of the crosswalk installed according to a green signal one-lane of one-lane of the 3-lane of the Gancho Police Station located on the 3-lane 2469 U.S., as the equipment of the Kancho-si, Gancho-gu, In the event of the Defendant’s vehicle’s driving, F, who has crossed the pedestrian red signal without permission, was shocked in front of

2) The accident of this case led to the death of F in low volume shock.

(hereinafter referred to as “F”. 3) The Plaintiff’s father, the Plaintiff’s mother, the Plaintiff’s wife, and the Plaintiff’s wife. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract against the Defendant vehicle. The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract against the Defendant vehicle. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the video and the purport of the entire pleadings

B. According to the above recognition 1), as the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant vehicle, the Defendant, as the insurer of the Defendant vehicle, barring special circumstances, is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the instant accident. 2) As to this, the Defendant asserts that as the driver of the Defendant vehicle, the driver of the Defendant vehicle, who is sufficient to drive the vehicle in trust to cross the crosswalk by complying with the deceased’s signal, and cannot be deemed to have fulfilled his duty of care by expecting the deceased to cross the crosswalk without permission in violation of the pedestrian signal, and thus, the driver of the Defendant vehicle shall

According to the above evidence, at the time of the accident, the Deceased cross the crosswalk from the right side of the direction of the Defendant’s vehicle to the left side, and the accident of this case occurred in one lane among the three-lanes, and the Defendant’s vehicle did not reduce the speed until the Deceased shocks.