logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고단2654
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 9, 2018, at around 00:43, the injured Defendant was assaulted from the victim D (56 aged) in front of the joint entrance entrance of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, 108, the joint entrance entrance of the 108-dong common entrance, and was tightly pushed off the body of the victim by hand, with drinking, once the victim’s snow part of the body was tightly cut off by drinking, and then the victim was tightly pushed down to the floor, thereby cutting down the victim’s shoulder up to the floor, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

2. On April 9, 2018, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) on the front of the 108 front road of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Building C, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, in relation to the foregoing violent case, entered the name and resident registration number of G in the F’s pocket book, while carrying out the activities of G, who is a relative, in order to receive a request from the E District Police Officer F to inform him of his personal information, and in order to conceal the fact that the fine has been imposed.

In this respect, the Defendant denied the resident registration number of G.

3. Around 01:40 on April 9, 2018, the Defendant drafted a letter of voluntary consent to accompanying, a written statement, and a written investigation process confirmation from F, the police officer in charge, who was investigated into the E District in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, with the foregoing violent incidents, and was required to prepare and sign a letter of consent to accompanying, a written statement, and a written investigation process confirmation from F, who was the police officer in charge, and was required to do so. As above, the Defendant prepared a letter of voluntary consent to accompanying, a written statement, and a written investigation process confirmation using the official seal in his/her place and submitted it to F, who was later signed by G, with the signature of “G”, and exercised it. A copy of the written consent to voluntary accompanying, written statement, and written investigation process confirmation in the name of G, which is a private document related to the proof of fact, was forged, and submitted it to F, who was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising the right, the Defendant forged one copy of the voluntary consent letter, written statement, and written confirmation of investigation process in the G name, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1.Written statements of G;

arrow