Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year at the District Court on September 6, 2012 for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 14, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. Defendant A provided forged private document with a forged lease contract as security and instructed Defendant B, an employee, to forge a false lease contract of KRW 30 million.

Defendant

B) On May 21, 2012, the Defendants entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the F building in Gyeyang-gu and the deposit amount of KRW 30,00,00,00 in the name of the Plaintiff at the time of Ansan-gu on May 21, 2012. However, in the location column of the real estate lease agreement, the Defendants entered into a lease agreement with the owner of the F building in Gyeyang-gu and the deposit amount of KRW 30,000,00,000,000 in the column of the building structure and usage, “ concrete”, “ deposit amount” in the column of the deposit amount, “three million,000,000,000 in the remainder column,” “Seoul-do Kimpo-si,” “I”, “J”, and “G” in the resident registration number column of the lessor, and affix arbitrarily

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge one copy of the lease contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and duties without authority for the purpose of exercising.

B. Defendant A’s uttering of the above investigation document is the same as Defendant B.

As stated in paragraph (1), Defendant B instructed E to present a forged lease agreement, and Defendant B, upon the direction of Defendant A, attempted to borrow money from a forged lease agreement, Defendant B, who was a notary public, in accordance with the direction of Defendant A on May 21, 2012, in the building of 701 in the building of Sungnam-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, to be aware of the forgery in L law firm.

As in the same paragraph, a forged real estate lease contract was delivered as if it was duly formed and used.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other.

(b) as provided in paragraph (3);