Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for one year, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

, however, the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On June 1, 2012, the Suwon District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on August 26, 2013, which became final and conclusive on April 2013.

The Defendants heard that the provision of the real estate lease agreement as security would allow loans from the credit service providers, and they prepared a false real estate lease agreement as if there are large amount of claims for return of deposit, offered it as security, and received the loan.

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant B and A;

A. On September 27, 2011, the Defendants: (a) conspired to forge private documents; (b) obtain loans as collateral at the house located in Ansan-si E and Defendant A located in Ansan-si; and (c) Defendant B drafted a false lease agreement with the following methods: (a) enter the column for the location of the real estate lease agreement into the real estate lease agreement in the column for the location of the real estate lease agreement; (b) enter into the deposit column in the column for the deposit amount; (c) the entry into the column for the deposit amount; (d) the entry into the column for the preparation date; and (d) the entry into the lessor’s column in the column for the preparation date; and (e) the entry into the false lease agreement with the marking of the G seal affixed in advance.

In addition, around the 28th day of the same month, the Defendants used the forged lease contract to J, a credit service provider, as if it were a document duly formed.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge and exercise one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of G, a private document concerning rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations.

B. On September 28, 2011, the Defendants presented a real estate lease agreement to the victim J in the above office of notary public joint office, and made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendants would repay up to September 28, 2012, the loan of KRW 5 million, which is offered as security for the lease deposit of KRW 15 million.”

However, in fact, the real estate lease contract presented by the defendants is stipulated in the first clause.

As stated in the above, the Defendants were forged.