Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B

A. When the Defendants were urged to commit the forgery of a private document and the use of the said document, the Defendants were able to use a real estate lease agreement in the name of lessor E with respect to the D cafeteria operated by the Defendants in order to obtain more easily the number of days loan.

Defendant

B around 2010, on the paper of the real estate lease agreement, a name-free person, who has written letters well at a non-permanent location below the unit line of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, and made him/her affix his/her name and seal to the E’s name, stating in the column of "F 1 floor of the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do," "22" and in the column of the Jeonsesesesese (guarantee) the “F 50,000,000,0000,0000,0000,000,000,000,000, and00,000,000,000,000, and0,00,

As a result, the Defendants forged one chapter of the real estate lease agreement in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations.

On November 2010, the Defendants conspired and continued to borrow money from the J that they knew of the forgery at an influent place (hereinafter referred to as the “Influence”) of the members of Ansan-si and exercised the forged real estate lease contract as if it was duly formed.

B. The Defendants made a false statement to the effect that, at the same time, at the same time, at the same place as the above-mentioned 1-B, the Defendants: (a) provided a forged real estate lease agreement, despite having no intent or ability to repay money from the victim J; and (b) provided the victim with the above-mentioned real estate lease agreement to the effect that “the victim may lend the money to the victim at a low interest rate; (b) the deposit is likely to be caused by this large number of deposits; and (c) changed the lending of money.”

The Defendants deceptioned the victim as above and received KRW 9 million from the victim as the loan money around November 3, 2010.

The Defendants’ list of offenses is attached between that time and February 7, 201.