logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.19 2015고단5545
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant visited a financial institution with an identification card, such as the resident registration certificate, which was forged by inserting the Defendant’s photograph on the resident registration information of a citizen of the Republic of Korea that he acquired by one name “D” in an unlawful way, and released the balance remaining in the account by re-issuance of the check-up card in the name of a third party as if he were another person, or conspired to receive the payment for the same. As above, the Defendant opened the account under his name with an identification card, such as the resident registration certificate, and opened the account under his name, and issued the passbook, cash card, andOTP card connected thereto.

1. On July 2015, 2015, “D” forged a copy of a resident registration certificate printed with the contents “E, resident registration number F, Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G, and the head of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on November 25, 2005,” sent by the Defendant in an irregular manner at a non-place.

The Defendant, in collusion with D in the foregoing manner, forged a resident registration certificate and a driver’s license in the name of the head of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which is an official document, from that time to August 2015, the Defendant forged the resident registration certificate and a driver’s license, which are an official document, in the same manner as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1).

2. At around 09:00 on July 10, 2015, the Defendant received a forged E’s resident registration certificate, which was sent by the above “D” at the vicinity of the 13 (Design-dong, Y-dong, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, and at around 10:28 on the same day, entered the National Bank Head Office of the National Bank and exercised the forged E’s resident registration certificate, which was a forged public document, as described in paragraph 1, to employees H who may know the forgery, by presenting it as if they were actually issued.

The Defendant, in collusion with D in the foregoing manner, uses a resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which is an official document.

arrow