A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 2012, the Defendant altered official documents: (a) around the influent area of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant considered “94” indicating the birth year among the resident registration numbers of resident registration certificates registered in the name of the head of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City as “91” in a way that kniffes off the side part of “4” in a knife.

Accordingly, the defendant modified one resident registration certificate in the name of the head of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, which is an official document for the purpose of uttering.

2. No person who violates the Food Sanitation Act shall drink alcoholic beverages with customers, singing or dance at a place where food service business is operated for profit;

Nevertheless, around 01:00 on June 26, 2012, the Defendant received 25,000 won per hour from the above E from the “F” entertainment bar operated by E on the first floor of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, which is a place of food service business, and provided entertainment by means of singing and dancing with four male members on his/her name, while drinking alcohol at the three indoor rooms with four male members on his/her name.

Accordingly, the defendant provided entertainment to customers at a place where food service business is operated for profit-making purposes.

3. At around 01:00 on June 26, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) indicated the name column of the site as “I”; (b) written in the name column of “I”; (c) J in the resident registration number column; (d) in the address column; and (e) written in the statement column as “L”; and (e) written in the statement column as “I”; and (c) signed as “I”; and (d) written in the statement column as “I”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant has forged a copy of the person who was named in I, a private document on rights and obligations.

4. The Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph (4) is authentic to the foregoing G and H who knew of the forgery.