A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the Jeju District Court for obstruction of the performance of official duties, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 10, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 5, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties in a deceptive scheme: (a) around 03:36, the Defendant: (b) at Jeju City, using his/her mobile phone to “D” in the 112 Police Order Office.

The request for dispatch by 5 last towing staff members shall be made.

A4 The paper refers to the site A4.

The punishment of death shall be executed and to be protruding.

“............” reported the content.

In fact, the defendant filed a false report without the intention of murdering D.

However, in Jeju District Police Agency 112, where the defendant's report of the defendant was known to be false, the E District Police Agency 112 was dispatched to the E District Unit and received the order from the E District Police Agency 112, and the E District Police Agency 2 was dispatched to the site as other police officers.

Accordingly, the defendant, as a deceptive scheme, obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of the reported case.

2. On February 5, 2017, at around 04:40 around 04:40, the Defendant would attempt to kill any man.

“A report is filed in accordance with paragraph 1 before the report is received, while the head F of the Dong Police Station E District of the Dong Police Station of Jeju, who was dispatched upon the report of 112, was searched by the head of the Dong Police Station F, and the head of the Dong Police Station of the Dong Police Station of the Republic of Korea was searched by him/her, and the person will die.

I will am.

“The Defendant was found to have returned to the Republic of Korea while crossing the border, and the Defendant was found to have checked and inspected, and the use of patrol cars, which are goods used by public offices, was 363,526 won for repairing costs, such as cutting down the part of the H patrol after the H patrol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A list of reported 112 cases;

1. Photographs related to damage to the patrol vehicle;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 137 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties by deceptive means), Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. To the end of Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the concurrent crimes;