A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 7, 2015, from 00:20 to 00:40 on the 1st floor parking lot, the injured Defendant, while drunkly drinking in the 1st floor parking lot, was sprinked with the part of the victim D(35 years old) who was on the parking lot without any justifiable reason, leading the next victim to a sprinking sprinkbbbbing string in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged property was accompanied by the mail that is managed by the victim E established on C1 floor by drinking alcohol at the time, time, and place described in paragraph 1, and that is equivalent to KRW 420,000 in repairing cost.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1), around 00:40 on the same day, and as indicated in paragraph (1) from police officers belonging to the F District Team of the Police Station of the Seosung-dong Police Station of 112, who were dispatched to the scene after receiving a report, to be a current offender due to the crime of assault as described in paragraph (1) and the crime of assault, and thus, during the patrol vehicle, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports by the police officer, such as assaulting the 112 police officer’s 112, who was dispatched to the scene by using the police officer’s police officer’s crying to the cryst of this swelth, swelth, and swelth of the bridge to walk the bridge on several occasions, and assaulting the h to the right edge of the police officer’s h.

4. The Defendant who damaged public goods did not comply with the arrest of a flagrant offender at the same time, time, and place as indicated in paragraph 3, and damaged public goods by walking the front door of the patrol vehicle patrol vehicle and walking the front door, thereby impairing the police officer’s repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D, H, G, and E;

1. Written estimate of general repair expenses;

1. Photographs of parts damaged by the damaged vehicle;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to goods for public use) of the same Act;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.