logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.22 2017고단3022
공용물건손상등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 13, 2017, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) was assaulted by his male-child delivery D on the front of the C main points in Western City B at Seopoposi; (b) reported the occurrence of the crime to 112.

The Defendant 22:15 on the same day and called up for a police box E-Sa of the Western Police Station, along with the police officer F and Assistant G belonging to the police officer assigned to the Seocho Police Station E-Sa of the same day and arrived at the parking lot of the police box for the Seocho-Sapo-si E-Sapo-Sapo-si, which is located in I.S.

After that, even though the defendant was requested from the above F to get off the above patrol vehicle under the influence of alcohol, the defendant did not get off the patrol vehicle and did not have his sloter.

No person who was installed inside the patrol vehicle as his hand by avoiding disturbance; and

112 Mack PC allocations, low voltages, back-to-end Kamerra line, black boxes, black boxes, and non-electric boats damaged the repair cost amounting to approximately KRW 600,000.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the internal equipments of patrol vehicles, which are goods used by public offices.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on the grounds as set forth in Paragraph 1 at a time and place set forth in Paragraph 1, who was arrested and detained from F, Inspector J, and Assistant G as a current offender damaging public goods and was brought in as a strike, and was under the influence of alcohol, to the said F during the influence of alcohol.

While taking a bath that “the death shall be discarded,” the above F was at one time at the left side of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant, by assault, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written estimate of general repair expenses;

1. Relevant photographs and photographs of police officers dispatched;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to goods for public use) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow