A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2012, the Defendant was in a situation in which the obligation to C, etc. was approximately KRW 60,000,000 and KRW 70,000,000, and the Defendant received demand for payment from them and was economically difficult.

The defendant was working in Korea Exchange Bank D, using personal information of high school-friendly E, which became aware of for the issuance of credit cards, to obtain a loan under the name of E and to raise money to repay the debt.

1. Forgery of private documents, uttering of falsified investigation documents, and fraud with respect to F radio operators;

A. A. On April 2, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at the F Communications Agency operated by H in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant entered “E” in the customer name column of alleh cellle, “I” in the resident registration number column, “I” in the Mapo-gu J apartment 101-2103; and (b) on the customer name column of payment of others’ consent, “A” in the relevant column, “A” in the relevant column, “K” in the bank name column, “K” in the bank name column, “L” in the bank number column, “L” in the application date column, “E” in the applicant column, and signed on the name side.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new application in the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant at the time and place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) submitted a forged new application to a “F” telecommunications agency employee who was unaware of the forgery, as if the new application was duly filed, as described in the foregoing paragraph (a).

C. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in the above paragraph (a) above, submitted an application for a forged new admission to an employee in charge of the above communications agency as described in the above paragraph (a), and applied for a Handphone joining as he was E.

However, as seen earlier, the new application for the admission of the above Handphone was forged by the defendant.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the employees in charge of the above communications agency, and makes one cell phone of the amount of KRW 890,000 owned by the victim.