A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated after the expiration of the parole period on April 30, 2010. On August 12, 2010. On November 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fabrication of private documents, etc. at the Ulsan District Court, which became final and conclusive on November 17, 2012.

The defendant had a copy of his personal identification card C, a relative C, with a view to opening his cell phone in the name of C.

1. KT mobile phones;

A. On March 28, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) filed an application for the mobile phone number of KT mobile communications E and F numbers with the D mobile phone agency located in Busan on March 28, 2012; (b) entered “C” in the customer name column, “G” in the resident registration number column, and “C” in the applicant column and signed “C” in the name of C.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged two copies of a new application for mobile phone in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, exercised two copies of the forged new application as in the above, as if it were duly formed, to an employee of the above mobile phone agent who was aware of the forgery.

2. LG mobile phones;

A. On March 2012, the Defendant forged private documents, when changing the user of LG mobile communications at H mobile phone agencies located in Busan, the Defendant entered “C” and “G” in the subscriber’s column in each application form and signed “C” following the name of “C”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged two copies of a mobile phone entry application in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The defendant at the time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph shall be an employee of the foregoing mobile phone agency who is not aware of the forgery.