logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.21 2015고정3283
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. A. Around June 10, 2010, the Defendant, at the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yongsan-gu agency, made a written application for the new certification of SHOW on the customer name column “C”, “C” and “C” in the resident registration number column, stating “D, in the address column, Jun. 10, 2010,” and signed on the applicant’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new application in C in the name of SHW, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. Around June 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around June 15, 2010, at the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yongsan-gu agency, entered “C” in the customer name column, “C” in the resident registration number column, “The date of application, June 15, 2010”; and (b) signed the Defendant’s name next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new application in C in the name of SHW, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant: (a) delivered the forged SHW application to KT agency employees who may know of the forgery at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) and (b) as if it were the document duly formed; and (b) exercised the same.

3. The Defendant, who did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost for the use of a mobile phone, has presented one’s paragraph (a), (b) date and time, and at the same place, two copies of the forged SHW new application and two copies of the resident registration certificates of C, and as if he had a legitimate authority to open a handphone, deceiving the employees of KT agency as he/she had C, thereby inducing the said KT agency to submit an application, etc. for the purchase of a mobile phone in the name of C, which was falsely made in the name of the victim, with two cell phoness (F, G), and received from the victim from July 2010 to November 201 of the same year a total of KRW 2,264,200,000 from the victim company.

arrow