logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.27 2017가합13208
재임용거부결정무효확인청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates C University and D University. The Plaintiff was appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University on September 2010, and around September 2012, the Plaintiff was appointed as a full-time professor at C University. On July 1, 2013, the Defendant and the term of appointment entered into an employment contract with the Defendant from September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2015.

B. At the time of expiration of the above tenure period, the Defendant reviewed the Plaintiff’s re-appointed in 2015, and notified the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for re-appointing the publication of Part II of the International AP paper for the period from May 1, 2013 to April 30, 2015.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff submitted a letter of vindication that there is one paper in the atmosphere of international A, and the Defendant concluded an employment contract with the Plaintiff from September 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016, by accepting the Plaintiff’s vindication.

C. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant held a teachers' personnel committee on May 27, 2016 and passed a resolution to the effect that the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for reappointment related to the publication of a thesis of international A/B, and that the Plaintiff was notified on May 30, 2016 that the Plaintiff failed to meet the requirements for reappointment even though he was subject to at least 10 points in relation to the publication of a thesis of international A/B academic journal, and that the Plaintiff was scheduled to publish a thesis in international C/A academic journal and that it was unreasonable to request the Defendant to publish a thesis each year in international A/B academic journal.

The defendant held a teachers' personnel committee on June 17, 2016 and conducted an examination for reappointment of the plaintiff on the basis of the plaintiff's written vindication, and even though the plaintiff was scheduled to publish this paper in the International A academic journal at the time of examination for reappointment of the previous year, there is no paper scheduled to be published in the International A academic journal until now.

arrow