1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Defendant is a school juristic person that establishes and operates a D University. 2) On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiffs were newly appointed as the assistant professor of D University GLCAL (LCAL) campus and Industry-Academia-Research Center (the term of appointment is from April 1, 2013 to February 28, 2015; the Plaintiff is a major in the Commercial Act; the Plaintiff is a major in the education law; and the Plaintiff B is an educational field).

B. (1) On October 15, 2014, the president of the Korea Research Foundation notified the Plaintiffs of the expiration of the term of appointment on February 28, 2015, respectively, and within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice. (2) Plaintiff A submitted an application for review of reappointment of teachers on October 23, 2014. On the same day, Plaintiff A submitted an application for review of reappointment of teachers on October 23, 2014. Plaintiff B submitted a performance report on October 16, 2014, stating the five copies of the paper published in the Korea Research Foundation and the one list of the thesis published in the Korea Research Foundation, and submitted a performance report on the evaluation of reappointment. (2) Plaintiff B submitted an application for review of reappointment of teachers on October 23, 2014.

3) On October 30, 2014, the subcommittee on the personnel review for reappointment of faculty members exclusively in charge of D University research conducted a review on the Plaintiffs’ reappointment on October 30, 2014, each of the Plaintiffs’ respective SCI/A&HI (hereinafter “SCI, etc.”).

) Requirements for publication of the thesis (as part 1, hereinafter referred to as “requirements for publication of this case”)

(4) On December 17, 2014, the personnel committee for the faculty of D University decided that the Plaintiffs would not be reappointed on the grounds that the Plaintiffs failed to meet the requirements of this case (hereinafter “the Plaintiffs”) on the grounds that they were reappointed.

5. On December 19, 2014, the president of the Dental University is scheduled to dismiss the Plaintiffs from office as a result of the evaluation of the reappointment of the research full-time faculty on March 1, 2015 by each e-mail, and the objection is raised.