beta
Text
Defendant
A and B shall be punished by each fine of KRW 3 million, by Defendant C, D, and E, by each fine of KRW 5 million.
Defendant
A, B, C, and.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
G is the J and the regular faculty of J graduate schools in HI and the J graduate schools, and K is the J and L major assistant professor of J graduate schools in HI.
G is in charge of guiding students attending the above J graduate school course, master's, and doctor's degree course, and examining the thesis as a professor and examiner of each degree course. K is in charge of the experiment directed by G in the above J graduate school laboratory since March 2010 as an assistant professor in charge of research.
1. Defendant A, as a herb doctor, is a person who has obtained a master’s degree in the 2017-year course of science from a graduate school from I University J.
A. Around April 2016, the Defendant issued a breach of trust stating that “The Defendant would offer the convenience of publishing papers in domestic or foreign academic papers, after passing a thesis examination,” among the charges of impliedly proposing that “The Defendant would substitute the experiments necessary for preparing a dissertation on the face of money and prepare the main parts of the thesis to pass the thesis examination” from G in the above I’s school.
In that sense, the registration of domestic and foreign academic journals is one of the requirements for the performance of the publication of a thesis among the requirements for the conferment of degrees, and the requirements necessary before passing through the examination of the thesis, and the Defendants’ dissertations passed through the examination of the thesis and then publication in the domestic and foreign academic journals are the primary purpose of inducing the prospective publishers of the next thesis to jointly base their performance requirements to meet their performance requirements, and thus, G's interest can be recognized as the contents of implied solicitation even from the Defendants' perspective.
It is unreasonable to see it.
Even if this part is deleted, it is judged that there is no hindrance to the defendants' exercise of their right to defense (On the other hand, this paper aims to meet the defendants' performance requirements for the publication of the thesis prior to the examination of the thesis.