1. The Defendants jointly pay to the Plaintiff KRW 65,00,000 and the interest rate thereon from March 1, 2016 to the date of full payment.

1. 원고 청구원인 주장에 대한 판단 다툼 없는 사실과 갑 제1, 2호증의 각 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고가 2015.경 ‘D’를 운영하는 피고 B에게 E 작가의 ‘F’(30호)( 이하 ’이 사건 그림이라 한다)를 인도한 사실, 피고 B는 2015. 11. 24.까지 원고에게 이 사건 그림 대금으로 330,000,000원을 지급한 후 2015. 12. 10. ’작품명: E F, 30호, 작품대금 : 參憶九仟五百萬원 整, 상기 작품을 상기 대금으로 정히 구입하고 11. 24.까지 총 參憶三千만원은 지급하고 잔금 六天五百만원은 지급하지 않았음을 정히 확인하고 12월 20일까지는 완불하기로 한다.

Provided, That in the event of failure to perform, I will provide the appraisal with a substantial amount of at least 65 million won.

The fact that “A letter of confirmation has been prepared and issued, and Defendant C, on January 6, 2016, promises to pay to the Plaintiff the balance of 65 million won to the Plaintiff by January 20, 2016.

(In the event of failure to do so, an undertaking to keep G Whitegs until implementation of G Whitegs) is recognized as having prepared and delivered a written statement.

According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant B agreed to pay KRW 65,00,000 to the Plaintiff on December 10, 2015, and Defendant C agreed to pay KRW 65,000,000 for the remainder of the instant forest as of January 20, 2016, and Defendant C agreed to pay KRW 65,00,000 for the same name as of January 20, 2016, and the Defendants jointly subscribed to Defendant B’s debt. Thus, the Defendants are jointly obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 65,00,000 and KRW 15% per annum from March 1, 2016 following the delivery date of the copy of the complaint of this case to the date of full payment, as sought by the Plaintiff.

2. The Defendants did not purchase the instant forest, but concluded a consignment contract with the Plaintiff around May 2015, with respect to the instant forest.