logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단2351
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

30,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 2351] The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On February 17, 2016, the Defendant transferred KRW 200,000 to the names in front of the building, “E”, “E”, from the front of the building, in front of the building, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City D, and purchased 0.5 g of approximately 0.5 g of the psychotropic drugs, via Kwikset Service Articles (one philopphone; hereinafter “Wlopphone”).

2. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant administered 0.1g of philophonephones purchased, as stated in paragraph 1, at around 17:30, on the one hand, at around 501 to 501.

3. On May 18, 2016, at around 21:00, the Defendant administered 0.1g of philophones in a way that scopphones are delivered to coffee by using it on a different paper.

[2016 Highest 2980]

4. On May 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened in front of “H” convenience stores located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) opened in the HG car without compensation a 0.1g of philophonephones contained in I for a single-use in the HG car; and (c) dice approximately 0.1g of the said phiphonephones from the Defendant’s home located in the building D (501) in Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City on the same day, dices in coffee.

Accordingly, even if the defendant is not a person handling narcotics, he received and administered psychotropic drugs.

Summary of Evidence

【Facts 1 and 2 in the market, 2016 Highest 2351】

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel argued that the Defendant reversed the statement made by the investigative agency about the crime of purchase and medication of phiphones Nos. 1 and 2 as indicated in the judgment, and that there was no such act. However, the Defendant made a very detailed statement at the investigative agency to the extent that it is difficult for the Defendant to take part of the process of purchase and medication of phiphones, and there was no circumstance to suspect that the confession was caused by coercion, etc. by the investigative agency, and the reinforcement evidence for confession is all or part of the criminal facts.

arrow