Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the defamations and insults as of July 13, 2014 is acquitted, respectively. The prosecution of the instant case is pending.

Part of innocence (each defamation and insult on July 13, 2014)

1. Facts charged;

A. From February 28, 2013, the Defendant, at around 11:00 on February 28, 2013, destroyed the victim’s reputation by openly stating the fact that “G senior trees raised 87 million won church money at the time of regular inspection held at the Diplomatic Association located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, and the head of E, F, and 15 members pastor and head roads. Therefore, the Defendant abused the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact that “A senior trees raised a complaint under the law and were in the process of embezzlement.”

B. On May 19, 2013, the Defendant, at the joint council of the J church located in Dongdaemun-gu I, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, destroyed the reputation of the victim by publicly alleging facts by disposing of the church’s properties in the manner of disposal of the church’s properties and returning them to the personal property. The Defendant, “G purchased the land at the missionary site of the Kazakhstan, and by publicly stating the fact.”

On August 4, 2013, the Defendant expressed that “The property value of the missionary area was 100 times higher than that of the missionary area of the Republic of Korea, and the head of the family-friendly company in the Republic of Korea is kystan, and the victim’s reputation may be damaged by openly stating the fact that the contract would be translated and translated.”

Around January 5, 2014, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out the fact that “The Victim G brought 87 million won to the church property, and made a provisional attachment to the church,” at the joint council of preliminary and settlement of accounts, which was held after making three p.m. worships, and the entire members gather.”

(v) On May 24, 2014, the Defendant stated the fact that “the amount of the scholarship passbook has not been met” and “the amount of the money should not be determined.”