The sentence of each sentence against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants A, B, C, and D’s joint criminal conduct (defluence) were the Helterology located in Ulsan-gu G G, Ulsan-gu, and upon having been suspended from office by the victim I, who is a pastor of the above church, around April 2012, the Defendants conspired to prepare documents, etc. to the effect that the honor of the victim would be undermined, and distribute them to the said church believerss.

On April 3, 2012, the Defendants conspired to make a letter to the effect that the victim would have donated the property to the members of the above church, and even though there was no fact that the victim would have donated the property to the above church, the Defendants thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly sending it to the above church by mail and openly pointing out false facts.

B. On May 9, 2012, the Defendants conspired in collusion to the effect that the victim contributed to the church money, “Igre the 12 million won of the Igrgian for three (3) years, who was said to have contributed to, and who was not the money of the multilateral church,” thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly sending it by mail to the above church believers and publicly pointing out false facts.

C. On October 8, 2012, the Defendants conspired to make a letter to the effect that “Notwithstanding the fact that the victim received 500,000 won in the value of the new family occupation, 500 won, which began to be received at the new family occupation value, is the period during which the expenses for the management of the company house are to be borne by the expenses for the management of the new family,” and damaged the reputation of the victim by openly sending the same to the new church by mail and publicly pointing out false facts.

On October 8, 2012, the Defendants conspired to give a scholarship to J by the victim following the resolution of the Council and the Scholarship Committee, and even though there was no fact that the victim sold the Y and the Y at the time of worship, the Defendant paid the scholarship illegally to the other party to the marriage (J).