Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On November 4, 2017, Defendant A used the victim’s body by talking about the facts reported by the Defendant’s husband G as an indecent act before the victim’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her body was cut off one time with the victim’s her body, being pushed down with the victim’s her two arms by hand.

B. Defendant B, at the same date, at the same time and place as the above A. B, assaulted the victim by both hand in setting up against the assault by the victim A (M, 52). Defendant B used both arms and was pushed down and pushed down on several occasions.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the records, the defendants can be acknowledged on April 6, 2018, which was after the institution of the instant prosecution, as they expressed their intent not to be punished for each other. Thus, the defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.