Text
Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The facts charged in the instant case are as follows: Defendant B’s transfer to the Jeonnam-gun E, and Defendant A’s transfer to the F, the Defendants are as follows:
1. Defendant B, around 11:00 on April 10, 2013, at an open conference held in the Myeon Office located in the Myeon Office in the Jeonsung-gun G, the Defendant b dumpeded with the victim A as a serious problem with the victim A, and committed assault by her hand by pushing the victim’s chest with his her satch and sating the bom.
2. While Defendant A was in a time and place above, Defendant A used his flab with the victim B, the victim first set up his flabbage against him, and used flabbbbbage, and used the victim’s chest by pushing the flab and flabing it.
2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the defendants who are in the position of victim against each other expressed their intent not to punish each other on the second trial date of this case, the defendants who are in the position of victim expressed their intention not to punish each other, so the prosecution of this case against the defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act and are so decided as per Disposition