Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged against Defendant B (58) is the representative director of D located in the net City C, and Defendant A (63) is the taxi driver of the above company.

1. Defendant A, at around 16:40 on August 9, 2017, who had a dispute with the victim B and the taxi commission as a matter of settlement with the above company office, was pushed down one time with the victim’s chest by hand, with the left hand, and carried the victim’s shoulder by hand with the victim’s left hand, and pushed down one time with the victim’s left shoulder.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the same date and time as, and at the same place as, paragraph A of this Article, the victim had been in conflict with the victim A, and the victim was satisd by fingers, and the victim was satisd with the victim’s chest once, and the victim was satisd by the victim’s satise once, and satisd by the victim’s satis.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. A written agreement that the Defendants do not want punishment against each other is submitted on September 18, 2017 after the institution of public prosecution.

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;