Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s fine of 6,00,000 won, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 4 months, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On July 14, 2015, upon being sentenced to imprisonment of 10 months and a fine of 3 million won for fraud, etc. to the District Court, the judgment became final and conclusive on February 4, 2016.

Defendant

A is the representative of the “H company” of the disinfection company, Defendant B is the representative of the “I company” of the food materials supplier of school meal services, Defendant D is the representative of the “J company” of the food materials supplier of school meal services, and Defendant C is the representative of the “K company” of the food materials supplier of school meal services.

On the condition of concluding a contract for the supply of food ingredients in schools, it was impossible for schools and schools to conclude a contract for the supply of food materials for school meal if the vehicle was disinfected and the certificate of disinfection was not submitted.

1. Defendant A and Defendant A issued a disinfection certificate to the effect that, on October 31, 201, Defendant B did not disinfect Defendant B’s MM vehicle transport vehicle at the “H company” office located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and that, upon Defendant B’s request for the issuance of a disinfection certificate, which is an accompanying document for the supply of food materials to Defendant B’s school meal service supply contract, Defendant B disinfected M vehicle on October 4, 201; Defendant B submitted the above disinfection certificate to the school meal service manager on October 31, 201, which is a public school located in Seoul, a public school located in the 2-dong Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, to the school meal service provider.

As a result, Defendant A and B conspired with others to obstruct the legitimate execution of duties concerning the selection of food materials suppliers of public school meals through deceptive means.

Defendant

A and B conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the selection of food material suppliers of public school meal service in a total of twice through a deceptive scheme from October 28, 201 to November 30, 201, such as the list of crimes (1) in the office of “H” company, and interfered with the selection of food material suppliers of private school meal service in a total of three times.

2. Defendant A and Defendant C are around September 2014.