Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a disinfection entity with the trade name of “E” in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, and Defendant B is a person who operates a high school food ingredients (agricultural products) and agricultural products distribution, and a seller with the trade name of “G agricultural partnership” in Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

The selection of a supplier of food ingredients (agricultural products) of elementary, middle and high schools is conducted through open competitive bidding through the Food and Drug Distribution System (EAT) of the school meal service operated by the Korea Agricultural and Fishery Products Distribution Corporation. In order to participate in an electronic bidding through the above system, each document required by the terms and conditions of operation of the above system must be submitted, among which the supplier is a supplier, for its members' private facilities and transportation vehicles (OT).

3. 31.) On a three-month basis, up to a half-month period (4. 1. to a half-month period).

9. 30.) On a regular basis, disinfection and disinfection shall be conducted once every two months, and a regular disinfection certificate therefor shall be submitted;

Accordingly, even if the Defendants did not carry out disinfection and preventive measures against the facilities and transportation vehicles of the said G Agricultural Cooperative, they prepared a false disinfection certificate as if they were normally carried out, and offered them to maintain their bid eligibility by submitting it to the said School Meal Electronic Procurement System.

Accordingly, the facts at the above E office around January 4, 2014 are as follows: (a) even though Defendant A did not disinfect the office of the above G farming association corporation and four vehicles for meal transport (H, I, J, and K), Defendant A prepared a false disinfection certificate as if it were normally conducted disinfection and quarantine, and issued it to Defendant B; and (b) from around that time to January 18, 2016, Defendant A prepared a false disinfection certificate for the above G farming association corporation facilities and meal transport vehicles for four times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table between the time and January 18, 2016, and the Defendant B issued it to Defendant B.