logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.10.12 2017고단1635
입찰방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of E, a corporation that supplies food for school meal materials in Busan-gun D Office Office No. 101, and Defendant B is the representative of G in Busan-do F, and Defendant C is the guardian of G in Busan-gu, and Defendant C is the representative of I in H in Busan-gun, and Defendant C is the wife of Defendant A.

Defendants are living together with the head of Suwon-gu J apartment 105 Dong 706.

School meal Electronic Procurement System (htp: / eat.co.km) is limited to only one enterprise in the same City/Do, which is developed in order to enhance the fairness and transparency of the process of concluding food ingredients contracts, and is limited to only one enterprise in the same City/Do.

Defendants kept a certified certificate issued to each company they represent at G office, shared the bidding price for the supply of school meal materials, offered duplicate bids in the name of Co., Ltd. E, G, and I, and recruited mutually to increase the successful bid rate.

According to the above public offering, at around October 27, 2015, the Defendants bid in the name of the “L” public bid to be supplied to K high school in the name of the said G office, and subsequently bid in the name of I and E, and eventually, in the name of G, the bid price of KRW 16,907,00 for the above contract was awarded in the name of the said G, thereby impairing the fairness of the school meal tender by winning the contract and doing so from October 27, 2016 to October 27, 2016, the Defendants were awarded the contract for the school meal supply of a total of KRW 1,303,490,776 in the same manner as in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to impair the fairness of school meal tender.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant A or B by the prosecution;

1. A copy of each certificate of M, N,O, or P;

1. Request for cooperation related to meal service suppliers in Busan District, report on the list of multiple duplicate suppliers with access to Busan District in 2016, the current status of relevant companies, and receipt status of civil petitions related to stopping, and the provision of meals in Busan District;

arrow