A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 27, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan Branch, and on October 27, 2014, a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime was issued in the Daejeon District Court’s Seosan Branch.

[Criminal Facts]

1. The Defendant is a person who violates Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

On May 2, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.108% of blood alcohol concentration, driven a car from the section 10 kilometers of approximately 10 kilometers to the roads in front of the Domsan High School located in the Domsan-si Domsan-si cafeteria to the roads located in the same city from the day before the Domsan High School located in the same city.

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document presented his official document under the name of the Commissioner of the North Korean Police Agency, who was in his possession of a prior official document, when he was requested to submit an identification card to D who was subject to the traffic control of the former North Korea Police Station by drinking influence on the roads prior to the foregoing Dasan High School, prior to the foregoing Dasan High School.

3. At around 21:55 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) stated the E’s name in the driver column, stating that “I will confirm that the above contents were identical to the facts as a person subject to drinking alcohol driving control; (b) acknowledge the result of measurement; and sign it on the notice that blood may be collected in an unfair case; and (c) affix his seal thereon.”

On the other hand, the Defendant continued to deliver the false statement report to the said D as if it were the document duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant is a master who is a private document concerning a certificate of fact for the purpose of uttering.