logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.03.04 2014고단1107
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 23, 2006, the defendant was issued a summary order of one million won or more for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Jeonju District Court's Gunsan Branch on September 14, 2007, a summary order of three million won or more for the same crime in the same court on September 14, 2007, and a summary order of 1.5 million won or more for the same crime in the same court on July 23, 2009, respectively.

[Criminal Facts]

1. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at least twice, and did not obtain a driver’s license as above, as the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act.

Nevertheless, at around 15:15 on September 21, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.086% of the blood alcohol concentration, driven the Banco-type truck in the section B from around two kilometers to around the original luminous road located in the same city-dong from the front side of the “Yasan-si” Yansan-si.

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document was an official document indicating that he was his driver’s license under the name of the Commissioner of the former North Korean Police Agency, which was in possession of a prior official document, when he was requested to submit an identification card to D who was subject to the traffic control of the former North Korean Police Station by drinking influence on the road prior to the foregoing original luminous company.

3. At around 15:35 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) stated E’s name in the driver column stating that “I will confirm that the above contents were identical to the facts, as I would have received notification that I would have to collect blood if I would have received notification that I would have to collect blood; (b) I would like to confirm that I would have received notification that I would have to collect blood.”

The defendant shall continuously state the name of E in his own column of voluntary behavior.

arrow