A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on February 16, 2015, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime in the same court on August 28, 2014.

1. Around 02:55 on June 12, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.401% without a vehicle driver’s license, and the Defendant driven a C-wing vehicle at a section of about 1km from the front day of the original Korean Ambassador in Jeollabuk-si, Jeollabuk-do to the front road B, Jeollabuk-do, in the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.401%.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle without a driver's license under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) deemed that he did not possess a driver’s license, who was subject to a request to submit an identification card on the front of the Seoul Special Self-Governing City, the D District Police Station D District E belonging to the Seoul Special Self-Governing Police Station, on the front of the Seoul Special Self-Governing Province; and (b) notified the “G’s resident registration number,” which called the “G,” and used it unlawfully

3. Around 03:20 on June 12, 2016, the Defendant forged a private document, and the uttering of a falsified document, at the places indicated in paragraph (2) around 03:20, the Defendant issued the said E’s circumstantial statement to the said E, stating that “I was notified that I would confirm that the above descriptions are true, that I would be the license would be cancelled due to driving at home, and that I would be notified that I would not want to receive the notice of recognition of the result of measurement and blood collection.” The Defendant stated the name of “F” in the driver’s statement column stating that “I would not want to receive the notice of blood collection,” and then, issued the written circumstantial statement to E who would not know the forgery as if the written statement

Accordingly, the defendant is a private document concerning a certificate of fact for the purpose of uttering.