logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.02.14 2013고단1726
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2008, the Defendant has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) or a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Jeju District Court, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months, and on November 5, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of seven million won for the same crime by the said court.

On 21:39 on 27: (a) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol level of 0.126% without a driver’s license on 201.27: (b) from the vicinity of the “Safety Industry Enterprise” located in Jeju-si to the front day of the “oilbrate” located in Jeju-si, the Defendant driven B vehicles at the section of approximately 500 meters from the front day of the “oilbrate” located in Jeju-si.

2. At the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, the Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official documents presented a model D’s driver’s license to a police officer who was in his possession of the person who was demanded to present his driver’s license from the police assistant belonging to the Jeju East Police Station as if he were his driver’s license.

3. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) entered “D” in the column of the driver of the circumstantial statement report stating that “I would confirm that the above contents were identical to the facts, and would have been notified that blood could be collected if you recognize and unjust as a result of the measurement; (b) signed the same on the driver’s name; and (c) delivered the signature to the police officer C as if he had been duly formed with the knowledge of the forgery; (d) forged the driver’s column in the driver’s statement report in the name of D, which is a private document on proof of the fact without authority for the purpose of exercising the authority; and (e) exercised the same.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Inquiry into the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, the report on the circumstantial statements of drinking drivers, and the register of driver's licenses (Evidence List 12).

arrow