beta
Text
1. The defendant
A. As to KRW 42,210,952 and KRW 22,454,80 among the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff shall be from January 26, 2008 to October 30, 2015.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. At around 08:25 on January 26, 2008, B: (a) driving a vehicle C (hereinafter “Defendant 1 of the instant primary accident”) on January 26, 2008; (b) towing the Plaintiff’s vehicle during signal signals from the library distance, such as U-dong, U-dong, etc., in Gwangju-gu, U-do; and (c) resulting in the Plaintiff’s injury, such as fluoral and fluoral base.
(B) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant primary accident”). According to the fact that the Defendant is liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the instant primary accident, according to the fact that there is no dispute: (a) Party A’s evidence No. 2 (including the number of branches; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (b) the purport of the entire pleadings) recognition of liability.
3) There is no evidence to limit the Defendant’s liability in the instant instant primary accident. B. D is a vehicle E around April 15, 2011 (hereinafter “Defendant E-Defendant of the instant secondary accident”). around 04:20 on April 15, 201.
2) On the part of the Plaintiff’s negligence, the Plaintiff driven the front road of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Jongno-gu and driven a part of the Defendant’s vehicle into a three-lane without operating the direction, etc., at the end of the end of the 4-lane from the right angle to the end of the 4-lane. In order to avoid this, the Plaintiff suffered an injury, such as the mouth of the left-hand body part of the upper left-hand body, the left-hand part of the 2-lane, the left-hand part of the 3-lane, etc. (hereinafter “the second accident of this case”).
(B) The Defendant is an insurer that entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s secondary accident.
【Ground for Recognition: Recognition of 2 liability for facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 8, the purport of the whole pleadings].