1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 84,273,517 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 500,000 to Plaintiff C and D respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) E is the FK7 Passenger Vehicles around December 14, 2012 (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) (hereinafter “Defendant 1”)

) On the part of the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s vehicle Gpoter Ⅱ (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving on the front section while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the front section of the front section and stopping the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the front section, while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle along the Plaintiff’s vehicle on the front section of the front section along the two lanes from the front section to the Incheon west.

) Defendant 1’s right-hand part was shocked with the front part of Defendant 1’s vehicle (hereinafter “the primary accident”), and the primary accident was followed by Defendant 1’s vehicle, and the I NA driver’s I NA driver’s vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 2”), which was driven by J driver’s vehicle, was checked into the front part of the NA driver’s vehicle on the right-hand side, and led Defendant 2 to the first accident (hereinafter “the second accident”). While driving the said NA driver’s vehicle into the front part of the NA driver’s vehicle and driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle again into the first accident (hereinafter “the second accident”).

2) As a result of the chain drilling incident that occurred as above, Plaintiff A suffered injury, such as pulmonary typology without reference to the heart of acute lungs. 2) Plaintiff B is denied by Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A, Defendant B and Defendant B is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Defendant A, and the Federation of the National Charter of Bus Transport Services Co., Ltd. concluded a mutual aid contract with respect to Defendant B’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 9 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 4 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the Defendants are the insurers of the Defendant 12 vehicle or the mutual aid business entity, barring special circumstances.