logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.19 2011가단220030
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants: (a) each of the Plaintiffs A, KRW 84,127,655; and (b) KRW 16,64,897; and (c) KRW 1,000,000 for Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) E is the F Poter Cargo Vehicle around 14:50 on May 1, 2010 (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) (hereinafter “Defendant 1”).

2) The Plaintiff A’s G A’s vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) driving the Plaintiff A’s vehicle driving on a one-lane road that is fit for Plaintiff B, C, and D, while driving the road along the upper part of the stream area in front of the flower complex moving in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the upper part of which is located along the upper part of the two-lanes of the two-lanes.

) The front part of Defendant 1’s front part is shocked with the front part of Defendant 1’s front part (hereinafter “the primary accident”), and the H Driving car (hereinafter “Defendant 2”) following the Plaintiff’s front part, which did not secure the safety distance, shocked the front part of the Plaintiff’s front part of the vehicle (hereinafter “the second accident”).

(2) The Defendant LAW Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant LAW Insurance”) is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract as to Defendant 2 with respect to Defendant 1, and Defendant LAW Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant LAW Insurance”) is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract as to Defendant 2.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, 10, Eul evidence 2 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the Defendants are liable for damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to their respective first and second accidents as insurers of Defendant 1 and 2 vehicles.

C. Limit of liability (Plaintiff B), however, in light of the fact that Plaintiff B was on the back seat of the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the instant accident, and that Plaintiff B suffered serious injury on the part of the Plaintiff, as seen below, due to the instant accident.

arrow