logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.26 2013가단304482
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., and lot damage insurance Co., Ltd., jointly, 111,267.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) B, around November 20, 201, 23:30 on November 20, 201, the passenger car (hereinafter “Defendant 2”); and

) A person driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle at Daegu Port Highway 57.2 km from the Daegu Port Highway 57.2 km from the Daegu Port Highway to the port bank at the port of port, and the two collisions between the central separation zone and stops at the first lane. The Plaintiff’s husband D is the Plaintiff’s husband D at the above border site at the above city (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) and the “Plaintiff’s vehicle.”

2) The lower part of Defendant 2’s vehicle which was stopped due to the preceding accident was the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant primary accident”) while driving on the said expressway and driving on the said expressway.

F. F. F. H.W. at the above location G A-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed

2) The lower part of the Plaintiff’s seat on the front side of Defendant 1’s vehicle, which was stopped due to the preceding accident, was placed in front of Defendant 1’s front part (hereinafter “instant second accident”).

(2) The Plaintiff, the passenger of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, caused injury to the Plaintiff, such as the 1st and the 3th century emission frame. (2) The Plaintiff was denied, and Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Tsung fire”) concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Defendant 1, and Defendant Bosil Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Singil Insurance”) concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Defendant 2, as the insurer for Defendant 2, and Defendant Hyundai Haskman Motor Vehicle Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Singk Insurance”) concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 8, 13 through 15 (if there are serial numbers, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), appraiser H and I's each entrustment of appraisal.

arrow