1. The Defendant’s payment of KRW 201,822,434 to Plaintiff A, KRW 8,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from December 17, 2010.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C is a D 11 ton truck around 17:00 on December 17, 2010 (hereinafter “non-standing vehicle”).

) A driver stopped across the three-lanes and the side due to a sudden accident that occurred due to the ice while driving the Gyeongbuk Highway located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) while driving the Gyeongbuk Highway (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff’s vehicle”). The Plaintiff’s vehicle following it was followed by the Plaintiff A (Seoul): E) driving.

) A road strings down the rear part of the non-party vehicle, and shocks the front part of the non-party vehicle (hereinafter “the first accident”), and the H Costaex vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) of the G G driving following the said vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) are left down, and the front part of the Plaintiff vehicle is shocked by the front part, and the front part of the Plaintiff vehicle conflicts with the rear part of the non-party vehicle (hereinafter “the second accident”). due to the shock, the front part of the Plaintiff vehicle re-convened with the rear part of the non-party vehicle.

2) As a result of the foregoing 1 and 2 accidents, Plaintiff A suffered from the injury of the Plaintiff’s 2nd century, etc., and Plaintiff B, who was on the Plaintiff’s rolling stock, suffered from the injury of Dam crym crym crym fry, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 6 (including additional number), the purport of whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. The defendant is only liable for damages caused by the second accident, but is not liable for damages caused by the second accident. However, joint tort liability does not individually seek damages caused by each act of the perpetrator, but is jointly held liable for tort caused by the perpetrator.