A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Music Industry Promotion Act: (a) received contact from the operators of the instant singing practice hall in the instant singing practice room at around 22:45, 2014; (b) received 25,000 won from the Defendant, after drinking alcohol with three male customers for one hour; and (c) received 25,000 won from the Defendant, after drinking alcohol with three male customers; and (d) provided entertainment to customers by singing or dancing.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an entertainment in a singing practice place for profit-making purposes.

2. Crimes related to "written consent to voluntary accompanying";

A. On June 15, 2014, at around 23:00 on June 15, 2014, the Defendant, as indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1, received a demand for voluntary accompanying from G of the police box affiliated with the police box of the dispatched police station by committing an act of reception at a singing practice room, and “The above principal was notified that he would be subject to voluntary accompanying from the police officer at the above time and place, and that he would be free to withdraw at any time as well as to refuse such request, and confirmed that he voluntarily responded to voluntary accompanying;

On June 15, 2014, the Defendant marked the “written consent of voluntary accompanying” as “H” on the column in the name of the “written consent of voluntary accompanying” as “H” and marked the Defendant’s name on the side of the part indicated as “H”.

As a result, the Defendant, without authority, forged the above H’s signature without authority.

B. The Defendant: (a) submitted to the police officer the signature of the above H’s name stated in the above voluntary accompanying document without authority for the purpose of exercising the signature at the time and place specified in the above paragraph A; and (b) exercised the above signature by allowing the police officer to file the forged letter of voluntary accompanying document with the investigation record, as if the signature of the above H was duly completed; and (c) the police officer knew of the forgery of the signature.

3. Crimes related to “written statements”

A. On June 16, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document using 140mal police station investigation as his/her decline at around 0:00 and the scriptive pension on the paper of the written statement at the I’s office.