A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the “C convenience store” located in Pyeongtaek-si B on March 7, 2016; (b) at the “C convenience store” located in Pyeongtaek-si B; (c) at the victim D’s market price located in front of his/her carper by taking advantage of the gaps in which employees’ surveillance was neglected; and (d) he/she carried a stack box with a level equivalent to 39,900 won.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On March 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily accompanied by a F box located in Pyeongtaek-si, which was controlled by the facts constituting a crime listed in paragraph (1) around 22:10 on March 11, 2016; and (b) voluntarily accompanied by the F box located in Pyeongtaek-si; (c) as if he was the Defendant-friendly G, the Defendant’s personal information was revealed; and (d) notified the head of the H police box affiliated with the same police box of the personal information of G of the personal information; and (c) upon having the above H presented the letter of voluntary accompanying consent stating the personal information of G, “self-verification” in the voluntary accompanying consent form means “an investment” of the document to be submitted; and (d) the examination in the column “defensor” column of the waiver of ownership was stamped by a color pen; and (e) stamped on each side of the name.

Defendant continued to submit the document of voluntary accompanying consent, voluntary submission, and ownership transfer form in G name as if they were genuinely prepared to the H Ha who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant each forged the consent of voluntary accompanying, voluntary submission documents, and ownership circulation notes containing the portion of private documents in the G’s name on proof of fact without authority, and exercised each of them.

3. On March 12, 2016, the Defendant, at the model office of the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station, located at the center of Pyeongtaek-si, around 00:39, in order to conduct an interrogation of a suspect for theft by the head of the I police station affiliated with Pyeongtaek-si Police Station, he/she would not have his/her pro-friendly G being aware of his/her personal information. Of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the I, he/she “a person who has made a statement” and “a person who has made a confirmation” column of the investigative process confirmation attached to the above protocol.