logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.01.16 2016고단2387
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 9, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.105% in blood while driving a vehicle at around 07:27:27, the Defendant driven a B earth car at a section of about 20km in front of the store located in the Chang-si in the middle of the street at Chang-si, while driving a vehicle with approximately 0.105% in alcohol in the blood.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, and then moved his/her personal information to the restaurant of the business office in the Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, and asked his/her personal information to the restaurant, and used the E’s resident registration number unlawfully by giving his/her name and resident registration number to the C Assistant Inspector D of the Gyeongnam-gun

3. The Defendant forged a private document and the instant investigation document without authority for the purpose of utteringing it at the same time and at a place as Paragraph 2, stated “E” in the name column of the main driver’s statement in the name of E, the written consent of voluntary accompanying, the written statement, and the written request for the transfer of the private document, and forged the Defendant’s circumstantial statement in the name of E, the written consent of voluntary accompanying, the written statement, and the written request for the transfer of the case, respectively, and used the forged private document by submitting it to slopingD who may know the forgery as the said document was authentic.

4. The Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation shall be subject to the control at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, and the E’s personal information was deleted, and the Defendant forged E’s private signature by stating “E” in the column for signature of the driver who was requested to sign on the portable Information Terminal (PDA) from the slope D, the control police officer, and submitted it to assistantD to be stored in the traffic management system (TCS) and exercising his/her private signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. The consent letter of voluntary accompanying;

arrow