logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.22 2016고단4762
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On November 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on December 22, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Detention Center.

[Criminal facts] The defendant is in a state that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental division.

1. Counterfeiting a private signature;

A. On April 3, 2016, around April 21, 2016, the Defendant forged a private signature on the letter of voluntary accompanying consent and the letter of waiver of ownership of seized articles: (a) instead of the Defendant’s personal information, entered the name and resident registration number (F) in lieu of the Defendant’s personal information, and entered “E” at the end of the letter of voluntary accompanying consent and the letter of waiver of ownership of seized articles, and forged another’s signature by leaving the name next thereto in order to not be punished for criminal punishment upon being voluntarily demanded to accompany D from the street above the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government street.

B. On April 4, 2016, around 01:45, the Defendant forged the signature of the subject matter in his/her own interrogation protocol. On the other hand, in order to be exempted from criminal punishment while being investigated on the facts of theft against D in the beneficial police station G located in 112-16 in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, as well as in the office on duty, he/she substituted the name and resident registration number (F) in lieu of the Defendant’s personal information without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her authority, and forged another’s signature by putting his/her seal on the end of the suspect interrogation protocol.

2. Exercising signatures on the above investigation;

A. The Defendant, without authority for the purpose of exercising a signature on the document of voluntary accompanying consent and the document of waiver of ownership of the seized articles, submitted the signature on the document of voluntary accompanying consent and the above document of waiver of ownership of the seized articles to the Ha, who was aware of the forgery of the signature, to the Ha, and the above document was submitted to the Ha, who was not aware of the forgery of the signature, thereby exercising the above signature on the investigation record under the E’s name.

(b).

arrow