A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

B From January 2014, he operated “D”, which is a sexual traffic business establishment in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 4th floor, and the Defendant served as an employee from April 10, 2015.

On April 19, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with B, received 100,000 won in cash from E, who was a guest at around 23:25 on April 19, 2015, and instructed F to have his employee cover the Cordeme, and sexual intercourse with G, who was a guest at around 23:25 on the same day, received 10,000 won in cash from G, and employed as an employee at two times in the above G, and directed H to have his employee cover the Cordememe in the above G’s sexual flag, and 23:25 on the same day, the Defendant instructed H to have his employee cover the Mameme, who was employed at three times in the above I’s sexual mixed, with 100,000 won in cash, and 3:00 on the same day, and ordered H to have his employee cover the Mamememe, who was employed by his employee at 20:300 on the same date.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute of the police suspect examination committee for E, G, I, K, and B;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor, or imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [Scope of Recommendation] 19 years of age or older, the basic area (from April to October) of the first category (the mediation of sexual traffic) (the mediation of sexual traffic) (the mediation of sexual traffic) is against the defendant. [Determination of sentence] The defendant is against the defendant, and there is no criminal record of the same kind, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances after the crime, etc. are taken into account all the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case.