Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of C, a corporation in Gyeyang-gu, Soyang-gu B.

On June 30, 2015, the Defendant received subsidies to maintain employment at the high-income branch offices of the Employment and Labor Offices of the Middle-gu Local Labor Offices in the Ministry of Labor, from July 1, 2015 to the same month.

7. Between 31. and 31., a plan for reporting on employment maintenance measures (temporary retirement) by 23 paid leave by 23 persons, such as workers D, shall be submitted;

8. The same year by submitting an application for subsidies for maintaining employment at the above high-sea employment center around July 19, 2015, a ledger of wages for July 2015, etc. to the said high-sea employment center.

9. Around 25.23 around the same day received subsidies for maintaining employment of the said 23 workers KRW 8,856,820.

In addition, from August 1, 2015 to the same month.

8. Between 31. and 31., a plan for reporting on employment maintenance measures (temporary retirement) by ten paid leave by ten persons, such as workers D, shall be submitted, and the same year;

9. The same year by submitting to the relevant high-sea employment center around August 15, 2015 an application for subsidies for maintaining employment (or pay leave), and the ledger of the monthly salary for August, 2015.

9. Around 25. Around 25.m., a subsidy of KRW 4,840,370 was received for the maintenance of employment for 10 workers.

However, on July 2015, 2015, 8 employees, including workers D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K, operated a bus and worked on the bus differently from a holiday plan, and on August 2015, 7 employees, such as workers D, E, F, G, H, L, and K, were not entitled to receive employment maintenance subsidies.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who is affiliated with the Ministry of Labor, obtained the issuance of the 7,047,640 won (the 2,207,270 won + the 4,840,370 won of the misappropriation around August 2015) from the 7,047,640 won (the 2,207,270 won of the 23 workers around July 2015) under the pretext of the employment maintenance subsidy from the employment-oriented local labor office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol of suspect interrogation of the police against the defendant, K, F, H, G, D, L, J, M, or E;

1. A notice of disposition of employment insurance for July 15, 15, a list of persons subject to measures for maintaining tea employment once every time, a report on the change of plan for measures for maintaining tea employment for 15.1, and a report on the change of plan therefor; and