logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.04.18 2016고정1202
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B The representative director, defendant, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K of Ilyang-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "D"), defendant, defendant, person in charge of dispatch, person in charge of vehicle dispatch, M are CNG vehicle safety management officers, and corporation D is established for the purpose of the chartered bus transportation, etc.

No one shall receive unemployment benefits, etc. by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, B The purpose of receiving subsidies for the maintenance of employment at the high-class employment branch of the Ministry of Labor in Gyeyang-gu around July 8, 2015 is to receive subsidies for the maintenance of employment, and the fact is, despite the absence of a worker who was employed by B as part of the measures for the maintenance of employment, that “14 workers, including M, etc., retired from office from July 9, 2015 to October 8, 2015” submitted a plan for internal use, and around September 14, 2015, at the above high-class employment branch of the above high-level employment branch, “12 workers, from among 14 workers, were paid from July 9, 2015 to August 8, 2015” and received a written application for subsidies for the maintenance of employment from the State on July 2015 to 200, 205 to 20 times the details of the subsidies for the victims, 2015 workers, 9.5

As a result, B was paid employment insurance benefits by deceiving the victim and receiving 9.6 million won as a subsidy for employment maintenance at the same time.

Around July 8, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime of B, such as having B receive subsidies for employment maintenance equivalent to KRW 9.6 million by stating the name, resident number, address, etc. in the consent form for paid leave, etc. at the request of B, in order to assist B, even though the Defendant did not have paid leave of absence.

arrow