A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the representative director of E (hereinafter referred to as “E”) who is a manufacturer and seller of non-toxication in South-U.S.D.

The employment maintenance subsidy system is a system that provides a certain portion of the labor cost paid by a business owner in the competent employment support center when the business owner who is inevitable to adjust employment due to the reduction of production, reduction of sales, increase in stock, etc. establishes a plan for employment maintenance measures in advance and submits the plan for employment maintenance measures to the competent employment support center under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Labor, such as temporary suspension, temporary suspension, training, reorganization of human resources, etc. after submitting the plan for employment maintenance measures.

When the operating funds of E were insufficient, the Defendant pretended to have paid leave benefits after registering a person who is not the employee of the above company as a regular worker, or pretended to have paid leave benefits to a worker who has not actually been temporarily laid off, and received subsidies for maintaining employment by means of overcoming the amount of leave benefits paid to a worker who has not been laid off, and received subsidies for maintaining employment and used them as operating funds of the above

On May 2, 2011, the Defendant submitted a false report on employment maintenance measures and a written agreement on employment maintenance measures in the name of F as if he/she was temporarily retired from office in Gwangju Regional Labor Office, which was located in 41-hhh-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-si education, to an employee in charge of the name of F, who is unaware of the fact that the F had not actually retired from office although he/she did not actually retired from office, and applied for the payment of subsidies for employment maintenance, and that he/she received KRW 954,804 as the subsidies for employment maintenance around May 17, 201 from the above branch office, from that time to July 8, 2013, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and received KRW 25,613,134 as the subsidies for employment maintenance for F, G, and H, at the same time.