Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,00, by each fine of KRW 300,000,000, Defendant B, D, E, F, G, H, and I.

Defendant

A. A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the corporation C (hereinafter referred to as “C”) located in the Dongsan-dong-gu K and the second floor of 204, Goyang-si, Manyang-si, and the representative director of the corporation (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and Defendant B, Defendant D, Defendant H, Defendant I, Defendant F, and L are respective chartered bus drivers of C, Defendant E are officers in charge of dispatch, Defendant G are vehicle safety management officers of CNG vehicle, and Defendant C is a corporation established for the purpose of the chartered bus transportation, etc.

1. For the purpose of receiving subsidies for maintaining employment at the high-class employment branch office of the Ministry of Labor located in Gyeyang-gu around July 8, 2015, Defendant A: (a) notwithstanding the absence of a worker who was employed by the Defendant as part of the measures for maintaining employment, Defendant A submitted a plan for internal use that “14 workers, including G, from July 9, 2015 to October 8, 2015,” and (b) around September 14, 2015, submitted an application for subsidies for maintaining employment with the content of “12 paid leave from July 9, 2015 to August 8, 2015, 14, 2015 to the public official in charge of employees from the above high-class employment branch office, who was paid by 14 workers from July 9, 2015 to 14, and received a written consent for maintaining employment from the victim (the victim’s wage level 2, 2015 to 20 times).

Accordingly, the defendant was given 9.6 million won as a subsidy for employment maintenance by deceiving the victim.

2. Defendant B, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, Defendant G, Defendant H, Defendant I, and the Defendants of the said C office around July 8, 2015, even though there was no paid leave of absence, in order to assist the said A in obtaining employment maintenance subsidies by unlawful means despite being aware of the fact that the said C office did not have to obtain employment maintenance subsidies, the said A’s name, resident number, address, etc. are written in the paid written consent, etc. as requested by the said A, and signed and affixed the said agreement to the said A, thereby having the said A affixing the said amount of KRW 9.6 million.