A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On January 29, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2.5 million from the Incheon District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Seoul Northern District Court to a fine of KRW 2.5 million on January 27, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around October 3, 2015, the Defendant, despite the history of violating Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on two or more occasions, was driving B-wing high-class cargo under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.134% from the 2km section to the same 69-class road as the 2km-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the 01:46th day of October 3, 2015, without a motor vehicle driver’s license.

2. The Defendant, such as the public electronic records, etc., and the public electronic records, at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), entered the resident registration number of “D”, which was sent to him/her by the superintendent of the police station at the time and place of the act as set forth in paragraph (1), and entered the Defendant’s personal information and details of the violation, etc. in the notice of drinking driving control by accessing a PDA device to the traffic police computer network, and then sign it in the signature column of the PDA so that he/she can write down a notice of the results of drinking driving control in the electronic traffic police computer network, which is the electronic records of the public office, and sent the notice of the results of drinking driving control, which is the electronic records of the above written public electronic records, to the traffic police computer network.

Accordingly, the defendant forged and exercised public electronic records for the purpose of interfering with administrative affairs of public offices.

3. The accused of forging a private document or uttering a private document shall belong to the traffic safety department of the Busan,00 U.S. police station on the ground of the act referred to in paragraph (1) at the time and place of entry.