logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고단6461
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 5, 201, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on September 5, 201, and on December 4, 2012, the Daegu District Court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a fine of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 9, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.134% without a vehicle driver’s license, driven a vehicle of approximately 1 kilometer C 1 kilometer in front of the same hydro-gu water-based pan-driving market located in Jung-gu, Daegu, Daegu, while under the influence of alcohol by around 22:50 on June 9, 2014.

2. On the date and time set forth in paragraph (1), and at the location, the name and resident registration number of the defendant, who was requested by the police officer in charge of the Daegu Water-Fighting Station in charge of the traffic safety control of drunk driving, to produce a driver's license, the above police officer entered and stored the above D's resident registration number, address, etc., known to the defendant by using a portable information device (PDA), and presented the screen as a result of the blood driving control of the PDA, and signed the D's arbitrarily on the screen by using a device pen in the driver's confirmation column.

As a result, the Defendant forged the record of the results of the drinking driving control in the name of D, which is a prior record of a certificate of fact, for the purpose of hindering the management of affairs, and immediately delivered the record to police officers who knew of such fact as above, as if it was duly formed.

3. The accused of forging private documents or uttering of a falsified investigative document shall be a driver in the report, who has received the written report on the state of his/her driver, by stating his/her resident registration number, address, circumstances of drunk driving, etc. from the above police officer at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

arrow