A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on August 25, 2015 due to indecent act by compulsion, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 25, 2015.

1. Around November 4, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Lextoning) driven a Csch Rexton car with a blood alcohol content of 0.122% under the influence of alcohol, from the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government) to the front side of the Cubton apartment located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “Cubton car”).

2. The Defendant: (a) had D, at the above date and time, read the personal information of pro-friendly E to the Inspector who is a traffic police officer; (b) had D access to a traffic police computer network using a PDA (portable device); (c) had D, enter the personal information, control details, etc. in the report; and (d) had D, who was requested to sign in PDA to enter the signature column, affix his/her electronic signature in the form of signature used by the Defendant; and (c) had D, as if the signature was genuine, send it to the traffic police network to enable D to affix his/her signature to the investigation record; and (d) forged and used the signature of E for the purpose of exercising the results of the control of drinking driving with which E’s signature was entered

3. The Defendant: (a) forged private document; (b) forged private document documents at the above time, at the above place; and (c) signed the name column of the written report on the de facto statement of the de facto driver; and (b) forged and exercised the private document portion of the written report on the de facto statement of the de facto driver in the above E’s name without authority for the purpose of exercising the authority by submitting the written report on the de facto driver’s statement to the said D as if he had been duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the actual status of a drinking driver (E);

1. A report on the statement of his/her oral statement (E name);

1. Making inquiries into the results of the control of drinking driving (E name);

1. 1. A written report from an employer;