The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for appeal (two years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., comprehensively taking account of the following: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the confession of the crime; (c) the health of a part of the crime; (d) the fact that there is no good health condition; and (e) the fact that there was a number of active cooperation in the investigation of the relevant narcotics-related criminal; (c) the fact that each of the instant crimes was committed again during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime; (d) the fact that the person was arrested during the crime of the same kind of crime and released on the grounds of health; and (e) the fact that the form of the instant crime was not easy; and (e) the volume of the penphone handled is not much small, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.