The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all kinds of sentencing conditions, including the following: (a) the confession of the crime and reflects on the determination; (b) the fact that the criminal investigation agency actively cooperates with the investigation of narcotics-related criminal; (c) the record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (d) the continuous commission of the crime was committed during the period of the same repeated offense; (c) the continuous commission of the crime was released despite the arrest during the commission of the crime; (d) the purchase, medication, possession of phiphonephones over several occasions; and (e) the fact that the nature of the crime is not less and less weak; and (e) the response to the training of phiphones as a result of the evaluation of urphones, the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, frequency of the crime; (e) the frequency of the crime; (e) the method of the crime; and (e) the circumstance after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.