The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for appeal (one year and four months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all kinds of sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., considering the following: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, the active cooperation in the investigation of phiphone-related persons; (b) the fact that the health status is not good; (c) the fact that the person was punished for the same kind of crime; (d) the fact that the person was arrested and released during the period of repeated crime; and (e) the continuous crime was committed during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime; and (e) the fact that the nature of the crime has not been somewhat weak, it cannot be said that the lower court’s punishment that already determined cooperation in the investigation by reflecting the cooperation of the important investigation as a special mitigation in the sentencing guidelines is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.